Inheritance Disputes

We understand how emotionally charged it can be to deal with inheritance and will matters that can lead to disputes. We deal with all clients in a sympathetic and supportive way to alleviate the distress of these types of disputes.

Contact Us Today

Call: +44 1904 217184
Email: enquiries@pw-la.co.uk

Last Wishes – No Will

A person dies intestate, if they do not leave a valid Will.  When this happens those closest to the deceased such as their partner in life or even their children could receive less than the deceased intended.  This could result in their assets or money being distributed where not intended, and it could also mean more Inheritance Tax than necessary which will reduce the deceased’s estate.

We assist executors and beneficiaries in various disputes including:-

  • allegations of Undue Influence;

  • disputes about jointly owned properties

Disputes About Wills

Leaving a Will which sets out clearly the deceased wishes can avoid many issues, however, arguments can and do still arise.  Losing a loved one is devastating and so very distressing when our emotions are at their most vulnerable during this time.  Family relationships are under considerable strain when everyone is coming to terms with loss and grieving for the deceased. 

Disputes can occur between beneficiaries (those entitled to receive a legacy) and executors (those who administer the estate after death). 

A Will could be challenged in Court in the following circumstances:

  • The Will was made under duress (i.e. under pressure from a third party)

  • The deceased did not have mental capacity at the time of making the Will

  • There is a technical defect with the Will, such as it not being executed properly

  • Negligently drafted Will

  • The Will was found damaged or torn

  • Promises of legacies made by the deceased outside the scope of the Will

Invalidity

The Wills Act 1837 lays out strict requirements as to the validity of a Will.

A Will must be in writing and signed by the deceased (or their instruction) in the presence of two witnesses who should also sign. A witness may not be a beneficiary. The best practice is that there should be a solicitor’s attendance note setting out exactly how execution of the Will took place.

Capacity

A testator must have a basic level of capacity. The test is not high and the testator must be capable of understanding the nature of making a Will and the effect of the proposed disposition, the extent of the assets which they possess and to gift,  and the “claims” which might justly be made against their estate (for example by dependants).

This is a common cause of claims. It is sometimes sensible where the testator is elderly or infirm to get a medical report confirming their capacity at the time that the Will is executed.

Undue Influence

The testator may sometimes be put under inappropriate pressure to make gifts in their Will. This is extremely hard to prove.  The Courts are alert to “odd” provisions – particularly where the principal beneficiary of such a Will has drafted it, or been instrumental in its preparation.

The law concerning disputed Wills/estates is complex. Rapid action can be necessary, for example to comply with the time limits in the Inheritance Act or applications to register caveats at the Probate Registry (preventing the issue of a Grant of Probate).

Grant of Probate Disputes

Once a person dies and there is a Will it is necessary to locate it so that a Grant of Probate can be obtained and the estate duly distributed in accordance with the terms of the Will. These steps can be problematic and complicated for the executor in the following circumstances:

  • The original Will is lost or destroyed

  • The Will is in the possession of someone who refuses to release it

  • Where a Caveat has been entered

  • Where assets are held abroad

  • Threat of legal action against those seeking to obtain a Grant of Probate

Equally, beneficiaries or persons with an interest in an estate may wish to ‘freeze’ the granting of probate so that a particular dispute or issue can be investigated.

A person can appoint up to four people in a Will to act as executor. Although executors should remain neutral, there is potential for disputes to arise between themselves and the beneficiaries during the administration of an estate. 

Inheritance Act Claims

The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (“the 1975 Act”) enables a child of the deceased to make a claim against their estate in circumstances where the deceased did not make reasonable financial provision for them in their Will (or by an intestacy). 

The scope of what constitutes a child extends to any child of the deceased including illegitimate, legitimated and adopted children of any age and any person treated by the deceased as a child of the marriage or civil partnership.

In recent years the courts have seen a spate of claims under the 1975 Act brought by adult children.  Under Section 3 of the 1975 Act, the court will take into account the following factors when deciding whether a reasonable financial provision has been granted for a claimant:

a) the financial resources and needs of the applicant;

b) the financial resources and needs of any other applicant;

c) the financial resources and needs of the beneficiaries;

d) any obligations and responsibilities of the deceased towards any applicant and any beneficiary;

e) the size and nature of the estate of the deceased;

f) any physical or mental disability of any applicant or beneficiary;

g) any other matter, including conduct, which the court may consider relevant.

The Inheritance Act 1975 may be used to challenge the distribution of an estate either whether the deceased left a Will or did not (died intestate).

The law does require us to make proper provision for surviving spouses, former spouses (and civil partners), children (including adult children), co-habitees (of at least two years standing) and anyone else who was “maintained” by the deceased.

In determining whether to grant an Inheritance Act application the Court has to consider the reasonable requirements of the Applicant. The test for existing spouses and civil partners is akin to their entitlement on a divorce – but in the case of other categories of claimants it is the sum they require to be “maintained”. In considering this the Court must taken into account a specific checklist of criteria.

The Court may in its discretion award continuing maintenance, awards of capital sums or transfers of land (outright or on trust) for the benefit of a successful Applicant.

Any Court application must be issued within six months of the Grant of Representation. It can be difficult for this time limit to be extended and it is therefore vital that early advice is sought if you believe that you are entitled under the Inheritance Act for provision to have been made for you.

Posted on Google Google
Duncan Gibb profile picture
Duncan Gibb
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was presented with a difficult redundancy situation I used Patricia to advise and negotiate my settlement. I got frank advice, rapid turn around and valuable experience. I would recommended if you are in my situation.
Posted on Google Google
Daniel Tarbuck profile picture
Daniel Tarbuck
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Patricia is knowledgeable and accommodating, we approached her to assist with some international contracts. Her service was friendly and fair. Will happily use her services again.
Posted on Google Google
Paul Sanderson profile picture
Paul Sanderson
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Extremely knowledgeable and helpful. Affable professional who really helped me, would highly recommend
Posted on Google Google
Darren Ransom profile picture
Darren Ransom
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great service, really knowledgeable and informative. Professional, great to work with.
Posted on Google Google
Donna Newell profile picture
Donna Newell
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Direct contact with my solicitor, never had to chase up or wait for calls returned. Not phased by my complex case with great knowledge and understanding of all areas in law. I highly recommend this firm to everyone, I found the fees to be affordable and fair.
Posted on Google Google
Turner, Craig profile picture
Turner, Craig
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Patricia goes above and beyond to help She was very prompt to call and advise and nothing was too much trouble I'd highly recommend her solicitors firm Brilliant 👍
Posted on Google Google
Caroline Long profile picture
Caroline Long
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Patricia represented us at the final hearing of our civil breach of contract claim. Patricia was extremely professional, well prepared and was able to gather and organise a large amount of paperwork in a short time frame. She was always approachable and answered any questions we had in clear and simple terms. We would have no hesitation in recommending Patricia to anyone requiring legal advice. Thank you Patricia for all your help and support
Posted on Google Google
Slawosz Ziarkowski profile picture
Slawosz Ziarkowski
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Our company has engaged in collaboration with Patricia to address various matters, each of which has been handled with the utmost professionalism. Patricia has proven to be exceptionally helpful, consistently delivering well-thought-out and suitable responses. I wholeheartedly recommend Patricia's legal services to anyone in search of expert legal advice.
Posted on Google Google
Heather Hiscock profile picture
Heather Hiscock
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Redundancy is a difficult time especially when your employer tries to dodge their legal obligation to you as an employee. You are in safe hands with Patricia who will guide and support you through every stage of your complaint. My case started during covid and we got over hurdles of backlogs and the outcome was positive for me. Highly professional and would not hesitate to recommend. Thank you Patricia!
Verified by Trustindex
Trustindex verified badge is the Universal Symbol of Trust. Only the greatest companies can get the verified badge who has a review score above 4.5, based on customer reviews over the past 12 months. Read more

Our Fees

Case & Document Review  - £175+VAT

Drafting Claim and issuing

possession proceedings County Court -

Section 21 Notice - £175+VAT

Drafting Claim and issuing

possession proceedings in County Court -

Section 8 Notice -£250+VAT

Preparation Review Hearing

(including document bundle)

& Representation  - £350+VAT

Court Fee to Issue Proceedings(subject to change) 

County Court - £415

Advocacy fee in addition if required for

final hearing - £400-£950+VAT

Warrant of Possession (drafting plus Court fee

(£152-subject to change)

Transferring up proceedings to High Court

for writ of possession and control

(Optional for Judgments over £600,

must be used for judgment over £25000)

Writ of Possession(includes High Court

Enforcement agency instruction) - £250+VAT

 

Why Choose PW-LA?

WHY SHOULD YOU INSTRUCT PW-LA REPRESENT YOU?

EXPERT alternative dispute resolution

With specialist expertise in dispute resolution, PW-LA delivers comprehensive litigation and advocacy services focussing on tailored fixed fees to meet clients’ specific budgets and desired outcomes.

CLient centred approach

Clients are priority receiving equal attention to your unique experiences, perspectives and circumstances; listening to your concerns with empathy and understanding, and acting in your best interests is the service you can expect. Taking care to ensure your budget aligns with your expectations and achieving that best desired outcome. You will receive clear, practical advice and representation, guiding you through the legal process with transparency, at all times mindful of legal costs to pursue or defend a case.

embracing advanced technology

PW-LA embraces the latest technology and tailored specialist legal AI software, passing on the benefits of reduced preparation times, and adding savings on costs. Providing you with convenient and efficient litigation and advocacy services. From virtual consultations to flexible communication options, including WhatsApp and Zoom, we ensure that you can access our services anytime, anywhere.

Get in touch today

Get in touch with PW-LA today for an initial free, no obligation consultation.

Our registered office is at Tower House Business Centre, Fishergate, York, YO10 4UA, United Kingdom.